Best Ever CRE Blog

Everything You Need to Know About the General Partner Catch-up

Written by Joe Fairless | Jul 9, 2020 7:00:19 AM

In apartment syndications, the General Partner (GP) catch-up is a distribution to the GP such that they have received their full portion of the profits.

The GP catch-up is relevant when the compensation structure of partnership between the GP and the Limited Partner (LP) includes a profit split.

For example, let’s say the LPs are offered a 7% preferred return and the profit split is 70% to the LPs and 30% to the GPs. At the conclusion of the partnership, 70% of the total project cash flow (ongoing cash flow and profits from sale) must have gone to the LPs and the remaining 30% must have gone to the GPs.

There are two main types of GP catch-ups. The most common is a GP catch-up at sale. The other, less common, is an ongoing GP catch-up.

The advantage of the ongoing GP catch-up is that the GPs can receive distributions immediately rather than waiting until sale.

Whichever GP catch-up you decide to pursue, make sure it is properly defined in your waterfall in the PPM.

To explain how each of these two GP catch-ups work, let’s use the following dataset as an example:

Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
 ($1,000,000)   $71,000   $77,000   $84,000   $93,000   $130,000
  • Profit at Sale (After $1,000,000 in equity is returned): $1,500,000

 

LIKE THIS ARTICLE SO FAR? THEN YOU’LL REALLY WANT TO SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER. IT’S SENT ONCE A WEEK AND PACKED WITH OUR BEST INVESTING TOOLS, ARTICLES AND STUFF YOU WON’T FIND ANYWHERE ELSE ONLINE. SUBSCRIBE OVER HERE.

GP Catch-Up At Sale

For a GP catch-up at sale, the LPs receive their preferred return first. Then, the profits above the preferred return are split 70/30. At sale, after the LP equity is returned and before the profits are split 70/30, a catch-up distribution goes to the GP until they have received 30% of the cumulative cash flow up to this point.

Here is a breakdown to the ongoing distributions to LPs and GPs:

  Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Total  $(1,000,000)  $ 71,000  $ 77,000  $ 84,000  $ 93,000  $ 130,000  $ 455,000
LP    $ 70,700  $ 74,900  $ 79,800  $ 86,100  $ 112,000  $ 423,500
GP    $      300  $   2,100  $   4,200  $   6,900  $   18,000  $   31,500

 

Based on the “Total” column, the LPs have received 93.08% of the profits and the GPs have received 6.92% of the profits. Therefore, the first portion of the $1,500,000 profit at sales goes to the GP until they have received 30% of the total profits.

Here is how you calculate that amount:

X equals $150,000.

After the $150,000 distribution, promote catch up the LP has received $423,500 and the GP has received $181,500, and the 70/30 split is achieved.

The remaining profits, $1,350,000, are split 70/30. This equates to $945,000 to the LP and $405,000 to the GP.

Here is the updated data table for cash flows to the LP and GP:

  Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Total  $(1,000,000)  $ 71,000  $ 77,000  $ 84,000  $ 93,000  $ 1,630,000  $ 1,955,000
LP    $ 70,700  $ 74,900  $ 79,800  $ 86,100  $ 1,057,000  $ 1,368,500
GP    $      300  $   2,100  $   4,200  $   6,900  $    573,000  $    586,500

 

The total distribution is $1,955,000. $1,368,500, or 70%, went to the LP. $586,500, or 30%, went to the GP.

Ongoing GP Catch-Up

With an ongoing GP-catch up, the LPs still receive their preferred return first. However, before the remaining profits are split 70/30, the GP receives a promoted catch-up distribution. This distribution is equivalent to a 70/30 split.

Here is how that amount is calculated:

X equals 3.

 

Therefore, the GP receives a 3% return based on the total LP equity investment. Any unpaid GP catch-up is accrued and paid out when possible. Once both the LP and GP have been paid, the remaining profits are split 70/30.

Since our sample equity investment is $1,000,000, the LP receives $70,000 annually and the GP receives $30,000 annually.

Year 1 Cash Flow is $71,000, which means the LP receives $70,000, the GP receives $1,000, and $29,000 is owed to the GP.

Year 2 Cash Flow is $77,000, which means the LP receives $70,000, the GP receives $7,000, and an additional $23,000 is owed to the GP. Total amount owed to the GP is $52,000.

Year 3 Cash Flow is $84,000, which means the LP receives $70,000, the GP receives $14,000, and an additional $16,000 is owed to the GP. Total amount owed to the GP is $68,000.

Year 4 Cash Flow is $93,000, which means the LP receives $70,000, the GP receives $23,000, and an additional $7,000 is owed to the GP. Total amount owned to the GP is $75,000.

Year 5 Cash Flow is $130,000, which means the LP receives $70,000 and the GP receives $30,000. The remaining $30,000 also goes to the GP to pay down the accrued amount. Total amount owed to the GP is now $45,000.

At sale, after the LP equity is returned, the accrued amount owed to the GP, $45,000, is distributed. Then the remaining profit, $1,455,000, is split 70/30. The LP receives $1,018,500 and the GP receives $436,500.

Here is the data table for cash flow to LP and GP:

  Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Total  $(1,000,000)  $ 71,000  $ 77,000  $ 84,000  $ 93,000  $ 1,630,000  $ 1,955,000
LP    $ 70,000  $ 70,000  $ 70,000  $ 70,000  $ 1,088,500  $ 1,368,500
GP    $   1,000  $   7,000  $ 14,000  $ 23,000  $    541,500  $    586,500

 

As you can see, the “Total” 5-year distributions to the LPs and the GPs are the same for each catch-up types. However, for the ongoing GP catch-up, the GPs receive more money sooner, which – in turn – means that the LPs receive money later. As a result, the LP internal rate of return (IRR) is lower with the GP catch-up.

 

  Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 IRR
At Sale  $(1,000,000)  $ 70,700  $ 74,900  $ 79,800  $ 86,100  $ 1,057,000 7.390%
Ongoing  $(1,000,000)  $ 70,000  $ 70,000  $ 70,000  $ 70,000  $ 1,088,500 7.320%

 

Therefore, the GP catch-up at sale is more advantageous for the LPs and the ongoing GP catch-up is more advantageous for the GPs, even though both the LP and the GP receive the same total cash distributions in each scenario.

 

 

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell any securities or to make or consider any investment or course of action.